[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170327235608.GA4984@jaegeuk.local>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:56:08 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: prevent waiter encountering incorrect discard
states
On 03/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> In f2fs_submit_discard_endio, we will wake up waiter before setting
> discard command states, so waiter may use incorrect states. Change
> the order between complete() and states setting to fix this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 57a81f9c8c14..9f9542c9fe47 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -717,9 +717,9 @@ static void f2fs_submit_discard_endio(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct discard_cmd *dc = (struct discard_cmd *)bio->bi_private;
>
> - complete(&dc->wait);
> dc->error = bio->bi_error;
> dc->state = D_DONE;
> + complete(&dc->wait);
If we set D_DONE first, the object can be released by __remove_discard_cmd()?
Thanks,
> bio_put(bio);
> }
>
> --
> 2.8.2.295.g3f1c1d0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists