| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:23:20 -0700
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"# v3 . 10+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Reported by syzkaller:
pte_list_remove: ffff9714eb1f8078 0->BUG
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1157!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
RIP: 0010:pte_list_remove+0x11b/0x120 [kvm]
Call Trace:
drop_spte+0x83/0xb0 [kvm]
mmu_page_zap_pte+0xcc/0xe0 [kvm]
kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page+0x81/0x4a0 [kvm]
kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages+0x159/0x220 [kvm]
kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all+0xe/0x10 [kvm]
kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x6c/0xa0 [kvm]
? kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0xa0 [kvm]
__mmu_notifier_release+0x79/0x110
? __mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0x110
exit_mmap+0x15a/0x170
? do_exit+0x281/0xcb0
mmput+0x66/0x160
do_exit+0x2c9/0xcb0
? __context_tracking_exit.part.5+0x4a/0x150
do_group_exit+0x50/0xd0
SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
The reason is that when creates new memslot, there is no guarantee for new
memslot not overlap with private memslots. This can be triggered by the
following program:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/kvm.h>
long r[16];
int main()
{
void *p = valloc(0x4000);
r[2] = open("/dev/kvm", 0);
r[3] = ioctl(r[2], KVM_CREATE_VM, 0x0ul);
uint64_t addr = 0xf000;
ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR, &addr);
r[6] = ioctl(r[3], KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 0x0ul);
ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR, 0x0ul);
ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0);
ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0);
struct kvm_userspace_memory_region mr = {
.slot = 0,
.flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES,
.guest_phys_addr = 0xf000,
.memory_size = 0x4000,
.userspace_addr = (uintptr_t) p
};
ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, &mr);
return 0;
}
This bug is caused by 'commit 5419369ed6bd ("KVM: Fix user memslot overlap
check")' which removes the check to avoid to add new memslot who overlaps
with private memslots. This patch fixes it by not add new memslot if it
is also overlap with private memslots.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.10+
Fixes: 5419369ed (KVM: Fix user memslot overlap check)
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index a17d787..ddeb18a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -978,8 +978,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
/* Check for overlaps */
r = -EEXIST;
kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id)) {
- if ((slot->id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS) ||
- (slot->id == id))
+ if (slot->id == id)
continue;
if (!((base_gfn + npages <= slot->base_gfn) ||
(base_gfn >= slot->base_gfn + slot->npages)))
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists