[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170328164159.GB29742@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:41:59 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
Cc: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>,
QCA ath9k Development <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
m@...sin.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: net: Update the ath9k binding for
SoC devices
> Oh, in that case you should probably go "all out" and ask on the
> LKML to remove all of the ath9k and ath10k ahb work. From what I
> know all the "users" are running some sort of OpenWRT/LEDE or a
> derivative. This is because Atheros/QCA provided a SDK based on
> OpenWRT.
>
> Alban has been trying to convert the platform to device-tree
> and add them to the mainline for a while now:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6514551/
>
> So, you are questioning this work as well.
Not at all. Ralph Sennhauser has been doing a great job of getting all
the Marvell devices into Mainline, and i help as much as i can, being
one of the Marvell SoC Maintainers.
I'm just saying, get a few boards which require these facilities into
the mainline, and then you have a much stranger base to argue from.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists