linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:49:11 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Marcel Partap <mpartap@....net>,
        Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing
 handle_reread

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> [170328 08:21]:

> > Right, my thinking here is that by pushing into genirq we minimise the
> > need even further since it'll also be available to drivers not using
> > regmap-irq.

> > > like, handle until we get IRQ_NONE? :)

> > Well, that's what the per driver emulation does so...  yeah.  Probably
> > with an upper limit on the number of times we do that.

> OK let's first see how that would work. I'll send a patch
> for that.

Thanks.  Can you keep me on the CC please?  It's something I keep
thinking about looking at myself.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)