[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170328192303.a732usin3tq6els3@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:23:03 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:29:31PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
>
> Scalable MCA systems have a new MCA_CONFIG register that we use to
> configure each bank. We currently use this when we set up thresholding.
> However, this is logically separate.
>
> Move setup of MCA_CONFIG into a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
...
> /* cpu init entry point, called from mce.c with preempt off */
> @@ -515,8 +519,10 @@ void mce_amd_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> int offset = -1;
>
> for (bank = 0; bank < mca_cfg.banks; ++bank) {
> - if (mce_flags.smca)
> + if (mce_flags.smca) {
> get_smca_bank_info(bank);
> + set_smca_config(bank);
Or simply bundle those two which do something SMCA-aware per bank into a single:
smca_configure(bank);
which reads almost like a sentence.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists