[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170328213254.GA12803@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:32:54 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, will.deacon@....com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86: use long long for 64-bit atomic ops
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:15:40PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> @@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static inline long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long new)
> * @a: the amount to add to v...
> * @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
> *
> - * Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
> + * Atomically adds @a to @v, so long long as it was not @u.
> * Returns the old value of @v.
> */
That's a clbuttic mistake!
https://www.google.com/search?q=clbuttic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists