linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm -v7 0/9] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during swapping out

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170328151358.80a14e40d1a431084bc27db4@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:13:58 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v7 0/9] THP swap: Delay splitting THP during
 swapping out

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:32:00 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:

> Hi, Andrew, could you help me to check whether the overall design is
> reasonable?
> 
> Hi, Hugh, Shaohua, Minchan and Rik, could you help me to review the
> swap part of the patchset?  Especially [1/9], [3/9], [4/9], [5/9],
> [6/9], [9/9].
> 
> Hi, Andrea could you help me to review the THP part of the patchset?
> Especially [2/9], [7/9] and [8/9].
> 
> Hi, Johannes, Michal and Vladimir, I am not very confident about the
> memory cgroup part, especially [2/9].  Could you help me to review it?
> 
> And for all, Any comment is welcome!
> 
> 
> Recently, the performance of the storage devices improved so fast that
> we cannot saturate the disk bandwidth with single logical CPU when do
> page swap out even on a high-end server machine.  Because the
> performance of the storage device improved faster than that of single
> logical CPU.  And it seems that the trend will not change in the near
> future.  On the other hand, the THP becomes more and more popular
> because of increased memory size.  So it becomes necessary to optimize
> THP swap performance.

I'll merge this patchset for testing purposes, but I don't believe that
it has yet had sufficient review.  And thanks for drawing our attention
to those parts where you believe close review is needed - that helps.