linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Support uncompressed kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:38:49 -0700
From:   "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:     Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Support uncompressed kernel

On 03/28/17 05:01, Chao Peng wrote:
>>
>> I guess the next step would be to use CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL on x86,
>> which requires an uncompressed kernel but has the additional advantage
>> of sharing the read-only sections of the kernel image across virtual
>> machines, resulting in better RAM and cache usage.
> 
> That is something we wanna look into :)
> 

It is, but that is a second order thing... especially since the x86
kernel makes heavy use of self-patching at the moment.  What would be
more significant, though, would be to avoid the memcpy() and instead
decode the uncompressed kernel in-place.

	-hpa