[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYcvwPt9WtTAfarpnAcRH3LUpA4LxrS1TASKiHrJ6GCvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:14:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gpio: pci-idio-16: make use of raw_spinlock variants
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Julia Cartwright <julia@...com> wrote:
> The pci-idio-16 gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling
> interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the
> irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a
> real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping"
> spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips.
>
> A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
> minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
> ---
> New patch as of v2 of series.
Patch applied with William's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists