[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170328122918.524644787@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:30:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 068/111] ext4: lock the xattr block before checksuming it
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit dac7a4b4b1f664934e8b713f529b629f67db313c upstream.
We must lock the xattr block before calculating or verifying the
checksum in order to avoid spurious checksum failures.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193661
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -131,31 +131,26 @@ static __le32 ext4_xattr_block_csum(stru
}
static int ext4_xattr_block_csum_verify(struct inode *inode,
- sector_t block_nr,
- struct ext4_xattr_header *hdr)
+ struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(inode->i_sb) &&
- (hdr->h_checksum != ext4_xattr_block_csum(inode, block_nr, hdr)))
- return 0;
- return 1;
-}
-
-static void ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(struct inode *inode,
- sector_t block_nr,
- struct ext4_xattr_header *hdr)
-{
- if (!ext4_has_metadata_csum(inode->i_sb))
- return;
+ struct ext4_xattr_header *hdr = BHDR(bh);
+ int ret = 1;
- hdr->h_checksum = ext4_xattr_block_csum(inode, block_nr, hdr);
+ if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(inode->i_sb)) {
+ lock_buffer(bh);
+ ret = (hdr->h_checksum == ext4_xattr_block_csum(inode,
+ bh->b_blocknr, hdr));
+ unlock_buffer(bh);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
-static inline int ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle_t *handle,
- struct inode *inode,
- struct buffer_head *bh)
+static void ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(struct inode *inode,
+ struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, bh->b_blocknr, BHDR(bh));
- return ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);
+ if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(inode->i_sb))
+ BHDR(bh)->h_checksum = ext4_xattr_block_csum(inode,
+ bh->b_blocknr, BHDR(bh));
}
static inline const struct xattr_handler *
@@ -233,7 +228,7 @@ ext4_xattr_check_block(struct inode *ino
if (BHDR(bh)->h_magic != cpu_to_le32(EXT4_XATTR_MAGIC) ||
BHDR(bh)->h_blocks != cpu_to_le32(1))
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
- if (!ext4_xattr_block_csum_verify(inode, bh->b_blocknr, BHDR(bh)))
+ if (!ext4_xattr_block_csum_verify(inode, bh))
return -EFSBADCRC;
error = ext4_xattr_check_names(BFIRST(bh), bh->b_data + bh->b_size,
bh->b_data);
@@ -615,23 +610,22 @@ ext4_xattr_release_block(handle_t *handl
}
}
+ ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, bh);
/*
* Beware of this ugliness: Releasing of xattr block references
* from different inodes can race and so we have to protect
* from a race where someone else frees the block (and releases
* its journal_head) before we are done dirtying the buffer. In
* nojournal mode this race is harmless and we actually cannot
- * call ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block() with locked buffer as
+ * call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() with locked buffer as
* that function can call sync_dirty_buffer() so for that case
* we handle the dirtying after unlocking the buffer.
*/
if (ext4_handle_valid(handle))
- error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle, inode,
- bh);
+ error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);
unlock_buffer(bh);
if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle))
- error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle, inode,
- bh);
+ error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);
if (IS_SYNC(inode))
ext4_handle_sync(handle);
dquot_free_block(inode, EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), 1));
@@ -860,13 +854,14 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, s
ext4_xattr_cache_insert(ext4_mb_cache,
bs->bh);
}
+ ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, bs->bh);
unlock_buffer(bs->bh);
if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED)
goto bad_block;
if (!error)
- error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle,
- inode,
- bs->bh);
+ error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle,
+ inode,
+ bs->bh);
if (error)
goto cleanup;
goto inserted;
@@ -964,10 +959,11 @@ inserted:
ce->e_reusable = 0;
ea_bdebug(new_bh, "reusing; refcount now=%d",
ref);
+ ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, new_bh);
unlock_buffer(new_bh);
- error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle,
- inode,
- new_bh);
+ error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle,
+ inode,
+ new_bh);
if (error)
goto cleanup_dquot;
}
@@ -1017,11 +1013,12 @@ getblk_failed:
goto getblk_failed;
}
memcpy(new_bh->b_data, s->base, new_bh->b_size);
+ ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, new_bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(new_bh);
unlock_buffer(new_bh);
ext4_xattr_cache_insert(ext4_mb_cache, new_bh);
- error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle,
- inode, new_bh);
+ error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode,
+ new_bh);
if (error)
goto cleanup;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists