linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] arm64: arch_timer: Add infrastructure for multiple erratum detection methods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170328145524.GD2123@mai>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:55:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
        dann frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] arm64: arch_timer: Add infrastructure for
 multiple erratum detection methods

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/03/17 15:36, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:07:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > 
> > [ ... ]
> > 
> >>>>> -bool arch_timer_check_global_cap_erratum(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> >>>>> -					 const void *arg)
> >>>>> +bool arch_timer_check_cap_erratum(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> >>>>> +				  const void *arg)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>> -	return cpus_have_cap((uintptr_t)wa->id);
> >>>>> +	return cpus_have_cap((uintptr_t)wa->id) | this_cpu_has_cap((uintptr_t)wa->id);
> >>>>
> >>>> Not quite. Here, you're making all capability-based errata to be be
> >>>> global (if a single CPU in the system has a capability, then by
> >>>> transitivity cpus_have_cap returns true). If that's a big-little system,
> >>>> you end-up applying the workaround to all CPUs, including those unaffected.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd rather drop cpus_have_cap altogether and rely on individual CPU
> >>>> matching (since we don't have a need for a global capability erratum
> >>>> handling yet).
> >>>
> >>> Ok, thanks.
> >>
> >> Quick update. I've just implemented this, and found out that getting rid
> >> of local/global has an unfortunate effect:
> >>
> >> Since we only probe the global errata (using ACPI for example) on the
> >> boot CPU path, we lose propagation of the erratum across the secondary
> >> CPUs. One way of solving this is to convert the secondary boot path to
> >> be aware of DT vs ACPI vs detection method of the month. Which isn't
> >> easy, since by the time we boot secondary CPUs, we don't have the
> >> pointers to the various ACPI tables anymore. Also, assuming we were
> >> careful and saved the pointers, the tables may have been unmapped. Fun.
> > 
> > My proposal was supposed to prevent that. The detecion is done in the
> > subsystems, ACPI detects ACPI errata, DT detects DT errata and CPU detects CPU
> > errata. The drivers get the errata and enable the workaround. The id
> > association <-> errata self contains errata types (void *, char *, int). So
> > everything can be done in a CPU basis without local / global dance.
> 
> I'm sorry, but it feels like a Jumbo-Jet sized hammer to try and squash
> a fly (I'm staying away from the frozen shark metaphor here). You're
> willing to add a whole list of things with private ids that need
> matching to kill a flag? I don't think this buys us anything but extra
> complexity and another maintenance headache.

Well, it is like your approach except it is split in two steps.

Can you explain where is the extra complexity ? May be I am missing the point.

-- 

 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog