[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170328145415.td4xeqxedem5yjen@earth>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:54:15 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] mfd: cpcap: implement irq sense helper
Hi Lee,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:27:16AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > +int cpcap_sense_virq(struct regmap *regmap, int virq)
> > +{
> > + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *d = irq_get_chip_data(virq);
> > + int base = regmap_irq_chip_get_base(d);
>
> What base is this?
This function takes an Linux irq number. That number is a virtual
irq number, which has nothing to do with the hardware. For example
a platform could look like this:
linux irq device base device irq
---------------------------------------------
0-63 SoC 0 0-63
64-127 SoC-GPIO 64 0-63
128-191 CPCAP 128 0-63
For the above example the function would map 128-191 to 0-63 as
used by the device.
> Could it be used to avoid some calculations in cpcap_sense_irq()?
No.
> > + return cpcap_sense_irq(regmap, virq - base);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpcap_sense_virq);
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists