[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5df9746e-a671-ed3f-89a1-fb6fe6ec4f4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:38:10 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jack@...e.cz, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...e.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] locking: Introduce range reader/writer lock
On 28/03/2017 18:58, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:39:18AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> I'll wait to see if there are any more concerns and send a v2 with your corrections.
>
> Have you tried drop-in replacement of mmap_sem with full range lock?
> It would be interesting to see performance implication for this.
>
I've a patch that replace the mmap_sem with a full range lock, it seems
to work fine for x86 and ppc64 for now. I'll send it soon.
But I didn't yet check for performance. What is the best way to that ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists