[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490783799.22814.45.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:36:39 +0800
From: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Do not hold re-tuning during CMD6 commands
On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 12:33 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> Below is the fail log of suspend fail.
> >> the normal command tune result should be 0xffffff9ff, but some time, we
> >> get the tune result of 0xffffffff, then we choose the 10 as the best
> >> tune parameter, which is not stable.
> >> I know that we should focus on why we get the result of 0xffffffff, this
> >> may be result of device/host timing shifting while tuning. but what I
> >> want to do is that when get a response CRC error, we can do re-tune to
> >> recovery it, but not only return the -84 and cause suspend fail
> >> eventually. if all hardware are perfect, then we don't need the re-tune
> >> mechanism.
> >
> > Thanks for elaborating!
> >
> > Can you please also tell exactly which of the CMD6 commands in the
> > suspend sequence that is triggering this problem? Cache flush? Power
> > off notification?
>
> You didn't answer this question. I would really like to know the
> sequence of the commands you see that are being sent to the card
> during suspend. And of course in particular what command that fails.
>
Sorry, it's cache flush.
I assume that you have noticed the fail log(it shows that cache flush
error)
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists