linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: core: Limit propagation of parent voltage count and list" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1ctCBd-0001hE-LR@debutante>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:54:49 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Limit propagation of parent voltage count and list" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: core: Limit propagation of parent voltage count and list

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From fd086045559d90cd7854818b4c60a7119eda6231 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:54:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Limit propagation of parent voltage count
 and list

Commit 26988efe11b1 ("regulator: core: Allow to get voltage count and
list from parent") introduces the propagation of the parent voltage
count and list for regulators that don't provide this information
themselves. The goal is to support simple switch regulators, however as
a side effect normal continuous regulators can leak details of their
supplies and provide consumers with inconsistent information.

Limit the propagation of the voltage count and list to switch
regulators.

Fixes: 26988efe11b1 ("regulator: core: Allow to get voltage count and
  list from parent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c         | 9 +++++++--
 include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index c20b28a63d15..aff302dfab5d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2484,7 +2484,7 @@ static int _regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator *regulator,
 		ret = ops->list_voltage(rdev, selector);
 		if (lock)
 			mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
-	} else if (rdev->supply) {
+	} else if (rdev->is_switch && rdev->supply) {
 		ret = _regulator_list_voltage(rdev->supply, selector, lock);
 	} else {
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ int regulator_count_voltages(struct regulator *regulator)
 	if (rdev->desc->n_voltages)
 		return rdev->desc->n_voltages;
 
-	if (!rdev->supply)
+	if (!rdev->is_switch || !rdev->supply)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return regulator_count_voltages(rdev->supply);
@@ -4097,6 +4097,11 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 		mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	}
 
+	if (!rdev->desc->ops->get_voltage &&
+	    !rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage &&
+	    !rdev->desc->fixed_uV)
+		rdev->is_switch = true;
+
 	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		put_device(&rdev->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
index dac8e7b16bc6..4cb1c9be6073 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
@@ -429,6 +429,8 @@ struct regulator_dev {
 	struct regulator_enable_gpio *ena_pin;
 	unsigned int ena_gpio_state:1;
 
+	unsigned int is_switch:1;
+
 	/* time when this regulator was disabled last time */
 	unsigned long last_off_jiffy;
 };
-- 
2.11.0