[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZTH8P53-aa6rJy=pu_btGvn7gZJLvJO2ynaEBdMZvVWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:04:48 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: jacopo <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add RZ/A1 bindings doc
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> I do not understand the notion of "flags" here. I hope that is not referring
>
> Flags refers to BI_DIR, SWIO_IN, and SWIO_OUT, from
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9643047/
Aha I will go in and review that closer because it doesn't seem right.
Sorry for missing it.
>> i2c1_pins_a: i2c1@0 {
>> pins {
>> pinmux = <MT8135_PIN_195_SDA1__FUNC_SDA1>,
>> <MT8135_PIN_196_SCL1__FUNC_SCL1>;
>
> If we follow this example, then we can list all combinations in
> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/r7s72100-pinctrl.h, instead of creating the value
> by combining the bits using a macro where we need it in the DTS.
>
> It's gonna be a long list, though...
Size is not the issue, readability is the issue. I don't see why you would
need to list "all combinations" since the trees go through the C preprocessor
so you can use macros and bit | OR to build them?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists