lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170329132211.51612-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:22:11 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 8/8] x86/espfix: Add support 5-level paging

We don't need extra virtual address space for ESPFIX, so it stays within
one PUD page table for both 4- and 5-level paging.

Redefining ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR using P4D_SHIFT instead of PGDIR_SHIFT would
make it stay in the same place regarding of paging mode.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
 v2:
  - make ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR the same for both paging modes.
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c             | 12 +++++++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
index adc3e7b107ee..06470da156ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ typedef struct { pteval_t pte; } pte_t;
 #define MODULES_END   __fix_to_virt(__end_of_fixed_addresses + 1)
 #define MODULES_LEN   (MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR)
 #define ESPFIX_PGD_ENTRY _AC(-2, UL)
-#define ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR (ESPFIX_PGD_ENTRY << PGDIR_SHIFT)
+#define ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR (ESPFIX_PGD_ENTRY << P4D_SHIFT)
 #define EFI_VA_START	 ( -4 * (_AC(1, UL) << 30))
 #define EFI_VA_END	 (-68 * (_AC(1, UL) << 30))
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
index 04f89caef9c4..8e598a1ad986 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@
 #define ESPFIX_STACKS_PER_PAGE	(PAGE_SIZE/ESPFIX_STACK_SIZE)
 
 /* There is address space for how many espfix pages? */
-#define ESPFIX_PAGE_SPACE	(1UL << (PGDIR_SHIFT-PAGE_SHIFT-16))
+#define ESPFIX_PAGE_SPACE	(1UL << (P4D_SHIFT-PAGE_SHIFT-16))
 
 #define ESPFIX_MAX_CPUS		(ESPFIX_STACKS_PER_PAGE * ESPFIX_PAGE_SPACE)
 #if CONFIG_NR_CPUS > ESPFIX_MAX_CPUS
-# error "Need more than one PGD for the ESPFIX hack"
+# error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
 #endif
 
 #define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO)
@@ -121,11 +121,13 @@ static void init_espfix_random(void)
 
 void __init init_espfix_bsp(void)
 {
-	pgd_t *pgd_p;
+	pgd_t *pgd;
+	p4d_t *p4d;
 
 	/* Install the espfix pud into the kernel page directory */
-	pgd_p = &init_level4_pgt[pgd_index(ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR)];
-	pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd_p, (pud_t *)espfix_pud_page);
+	pgd = &init_level4_pgt[pgd_index(ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR)];
+	p4d = p4d_alloc(&init_mm, pgd, ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR);
+	p4d_populate(&init_mm, p4d, espfix_pud_page);
 
 	/* Randomize the locations */
 	init_espfix_random();
-- 
2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ