[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490794343.5481.33.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:32:23 +0300
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@....com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Octavian Purdila" <octavian.purdila@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sabresd: Enable fsl,ldo-bypass
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 18:13 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.03.2017, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Leonard Crestez:
> > This enables LDO bypass by default on the imx6qdl-sabresd boards. New
> > dts files with -ldo suffix are added for users who want to run with LDOs
> > enabled on these boards anyway.
> Given that using LDO bypass affects the device lifetime negatively (see
> AN4724), I think the default should still be to use LDO enabled mode and
> have new DTs for people that desire to shorten the lifetime of the SoC
> for a minimal drop in power consumption.
This was based on what the Freescale BSP does, I don't particularly
object to upstream having a different default. It would be nice for
testing if this ldo-bypass path was enabled by default for some boards
but it's not a very good reason.
I will switch the default.
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists