[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wrfjpoh0dqzz.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:47:28 -0400
From: jes.sorensen@...il.com
To: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: neilb@...e.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mdadm.c: fix compile error "switch condition has boolean value"
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com> writes:
> Remove a boolean expression in switch condition
> to prevent compile error of some compilers.
Please be specific, which compile is unable to handle this?
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>
> ---
> mdadm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mdadm.c b/mdadm.c
> index 08ddcab..a98a051 100644
> --- a/mdadm.c
> +++ b/mdadm.c
> @@ -1905,11 +1905,11 @@ static int misc_list(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
> rv |= SetAction(dv->devname, c->action);
> continue;
> }
> - switch(dv->devname[0] == '/') {
> - case 0:
> + switch(dv->devname[0]) {
> + default:
> mdfd = open_dev(dv->devname);
> if (mdfd >= 0) break;
> - case 1:
> + case '/':
> mdfd = open_mddev(dv->devname, 1);
> }
> if (mdfd>=0) {
While I agree the original code is ugly, I am not convinced your
replacement is a lot prettier.
Thanks,
Jes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists