[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170329022545.GB19448@sejong>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:25:45 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Fix function pid filter on instances
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:08:41PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:46:22 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > When function tracer has a pid filter, it adds a probe to sched_switch
> > to track if current task can be ignored. The probe checks the
> > ftrace_ignore_pid from current tr to filter tasks. But it misses to
> > delete the probe when removing an instance so that it can cause a crash
> > due to the invalid tr pointer (use-after-free).
> >
> > This is easily reproducible with the following:
> >
> > # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> > # mkdir instances/buggy
> > # echo $$ > instances/buggy/set_ftrace_pid
> > # rmdir instances/buggy
> >
> > ============================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_filter_pid_sched_switch_probe+0x3d/0x90
> > Read of size 8 by task kworker/0:1/17
> > CPU: 0 PID: 17 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G B 4.11.0-rc3 #198
> > Call Trace:
> > dump_stack+0x68/0x9f
> > kasan_object_err+0x21/0x70
> > kasan_report.part.1+0x22b/0x500
> > ? ftrace_filter_pid_sched_switch_probe+0x3d/0x90
> > kasan_report+0x25/0x30
> > __asan_load8+0x5e/0x70
> > ftrace_filter_pid_sched_switch_probe+0x3d/0x90
> > ? fpid_start+0x130/0x130
> > __schedule+0x571/0xce0
> > ...
> >
> > To fix it, use ftrace_pid_reset() to unregister the probe. As
> > instance_rmdir() already updated ftrace codes, it can just free the
> > filter safely.
> >
> > Fixes: 0c8916c34203 ("tracing: Add rmdir to remove multibuffer instances")
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 10 ++++++----
> > kernel/trace/trace.c | 1 +
> > kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > index 0556a202c055..b451a860e885 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -5598,13 +5598,15 @@ static void clear_ftrace_pids(struct trace_array *tr)
> > trace_free_pid_list(pid_list);
> > }
> >
> > -static void ftrace_pid_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
> > +void ftrace_pid_reset(struct trace_array *tr, bool update)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&ftrace_lock);
> > clear_ftrace_pids(tr);
> >
> > - ftrace_update_pid_func();
> > - ftrace_startup_all(0);
> > + if (update) {
> > + ftrace_update_pid_func();
> > + ftrace_startup_all(0);
> > + }
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);
> > }
>
> I think it is better to create a new function here. I mean, you just
> added a bool, that removes 2 thirds of the code when false.
Ah, missed this part. Ok, I'll make it a separate function.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists