lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:19:30 +0200 From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/events: Introduce sched_entity load tracking trace event On 03/28/2017 06:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > >> Do you think that making them public in include/linux/sched.h is the way to >> go? > > No; all that stuff should really stay private. tracepoints are a very > bad reason to leak this stuff. Understood & makes sense to me. In hindsight, it's not too complicated to code group_cfs_rq in include/trace/events/sched.h.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists