[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7941583.LZOQImzPvq@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 23:25:23 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
smuckle.linux@...il.com, juri.lelli@....com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, patrick.bellasi@....com,
eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/9] sched: cpufreq: extend irq work to support fast switches
On Thursday, March 09, 2017 05:15:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@...il.com>
>
> In preparation for schedutil receiving sched cpufreq callbacks for
> remote CPUs, extend the irq work in schedutil to support policies with
> fast switching enabled in addition to policies using the slow path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@...il.com>
> [ vk: minor code updates ]
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
This should be merged with the [6/9].
As is, it requires me to look at two patches at the same time to make sense out
of it.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists