[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23902.1490904827@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:13:47 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Apparent backward time travel in timestamps on file creation
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> The error bar can be huge, for the simple reason that the filesystem
> you are testing may not be sharing a clock with the CPU at _all_.
>
> IOW, think network filesystems.
Can't I just not do the tests when the filesystem is a network fs? I don't
think it should be a problem for disk filesystems on network-attached storage.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists