linux-kernel - Re: spin_lock behavior with ARM64 big.Little/HMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <537888bcf5dd5ea3c3418fc9e9e3ff79@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:12:23 -0700
From:   Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spin_lock behavior with ARM64 big.Little/HMP

Hi Sudeep,

> 
> Interesting. Just curious if this is r0p0/p1 A53 ? If so, is the errata
> 819472 enabled ?

Sorry for bringing this up after the loo-ong delay, but I've been 
assured that the A53 involved is > r0p1. I've also confirmed this 
problem on multiple internal platforms, and I'm pretty sure that it 
occurs on any b.L out there today. Also, we found the same problematic 
lock design used in the workqueue code in the kernel, causing the same 
livelock. It's very very rare and requires a perfect set of 
circumstances.

If it would help I can provide a unit test if you folks would be 
generous enough to test it on the latest Juno or something b.L that's 
also upstream.

Thanks,
Vikram