linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:09:26 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:34:52AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-03-27 16:21, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > Hi Greg!
> > 
> > Please apply.
> >
> 
> *snip snip*
> 
> > v10 -> v11 changes
> > - added a new patch (12) with a fix for messed up error path reported
> >   by Paul Gortmaker.
> 
> Oops, should be Dan Carpenter. Sorry about that...
> 
> And, I forgot to high-light this:
> 
> > v4 -> v5 changes
> > - driver for Analog Devices ADG792A/G, literally the first mux chip
> >   I found on the Internet with an i2c interface (that was not a
> >   dedicated i2c multiplexer like PCA9547) which I used to verify
> >   that the abstractions in the mux core are up to the task. Untested,
> >   just proof of concept that at least looks pretty and compiles...
> 
> Maybe the patches related to adg792 (last two patches in v12) should
> not be applied? I don't care much either way, your call Greg...

Give me a chance to catch up on reviews, your patch series is behind
400+ other emails...

greg k-h