lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:09:54 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        "stable [v4.9]" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix O_TMPFILE corner case in ubifs_link()

Amir,

Am 30.03.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>> Amir,
>>
>> Am 30.03.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>>>> It is perfectly fine to link a tmpfile back using linkat().
>>>> Since tmpfiles are created with a link count of 0 they appear
>>>> on the orphan list, upon re-linking the inode has to be removed
>>>> from the orphan list again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com
>>>
>>> typo: missing closing >
>>
>> Whoops, copied one byte too few from Thunderbird. :D
>> Will fix before pushing.
>>
> 
> 
> It's worth mentioning the bug that Ralph reported.
> The fact that overlayfs mount in v4.11-rc causes corruption of ubifs is much
> more severe than what the current commit message implies (fix of a corner case).

Okay, I'll add more drama to the commit message.
Usually I assume that stable patches for filesystems are considered as something
serious.

> I would also add # v4.9 hint to stable tag, just to be nice ;-)

Isn't this why we have the Fixes tag?

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ