lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e118215b-0a44-e1d7-c665-41112a44df0a@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:40:41 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in the kvm tree



On 30/03/2017 00:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> I noticed that several commits in the kvm tree
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git#linux-next) today have
> no Signed-off-by for their committer :-(

Hmm, that must have happened because I rebased them before (testing and)
pushing to kvm/next; kvm/next does not rebase but kvm/queue does.

Still, it's weird because I have done that many times and it's the first
time you noticed.  Do you have scripts for that or did you just happen
to notice?  Or maybe there is a difference in what "git rebase" vs. "git
rebase -i" does to the committer email, or something obscure like that.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ