[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58DCD47C.2010501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:18:44 +0530
From: Anurup M <anurupvasu@...il.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, anurup.m@...wei.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, tanxiaojun@...wei.com,
xuwei5@...ilicon.com, sanil.kumar@...ilicon.com,
john.garry@...wei.com, gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com,
shiju.jose@...wei.com, huangdaode@...ilicon.com,
linuxarm@...wei.com, dikshit.n@...wei.com, shyju.pv@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon
SoC event counters
On Tuesday 21 March 2017 10:22 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> +static int hisi_hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> >+{
> >+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> >+ struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> >+ struct device *dev = hisi_pmu->dev;
>> +
>> >+ /*
>> >+ * We must NOT create groups containing mixed PMUs, although
>> >+ * software events are acceptable
>> >+ */
>> >+ if (event->group_leader->pmu != event->pmu &&
>> >+ !is_software_event(event->group_leader))
>> >+ return -EINVAL;
>> >+
>> >+ list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list,
>> >+ group_entry)
>> >+ if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu && !is_software_event(sibling))
>> >+ return -EINVAL;
> Please also check the number of counters.
Sorry, I could not follow this comment correctly. Could you please explain ?
I check the available counters and update used mask in pmu_add -->
get_event_index
Thanks,
Anurup
> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists