linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 04/16] KVM: x86: cleanup the page tracking SRCU instance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170330100431.713673441@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:15:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 04/16] KVM: x86: cleanup the page tracking SRCU instance

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

commit 2beb6dad2e8f95d710159d5befb390e4f62ab5cf upstream.

SRCU uses a delayed work item.  Skip cleaning it up, and
the result is use-after-free in the work item callbacks.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Fixes: 0eb05bf290cfe8610d9680b49abef37febd1c38a
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c             |    8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |    1 +
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 };
 
 void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
 				 struct kvm_memory_slot *dont);
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
@@ -156,6 +156,14 @@ bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm
 	return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
 }
 
+void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+	head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+	cleanup_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
+}
+
 void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7976,6 +7976,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm
 	kvm_free_vcpus(kvm);
 	kvfree(rcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.apic_map, 1));
 	kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
+	kvm_page_track_cleanup(kvm);
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *free,