[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <58DCE46C.3060501@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:56:44 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, chanwoo@...nel.org,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] extcon: Add new extcon_register_notifier_all() to
monitor all external connectors
On 2017년 03월 30일 19:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>> On 2017년 03월 30일 18:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>> The extcon core already provides the extcon_register_notifier() function
>>>> in order to register the notifier block which is used to monitor
>>>> the status change for the specific external connector such as EXTCON_USB,
>>>> EXTCON_USB_HOST and so on. The extcon consumer uses the this function.
>>>>
>>>> The extcon consumer may need to monitor the all supported external
>>>> connectors from the extcon device. In this case, The extcon consumer
>>>> should have each notifier_block structure for each external connector.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds the new extcon_register_notifier_all() function
>>>> that extcon consumer is able to monitor the status change of all
>>>> supported external connectors by using only one notifier_block structure.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * extcon_register_notifier_all() - Register a notifier block to get the noti
>>>> + * of the status change for all supported external
>>>> + * connectors from extcon.
>>>> + * @edev: the extcon device that has the external connecotr.
>>>> + * @nb: a notifier block to be registered.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Note that the second parameter given to the callback of nb (val) is
>>>> + * the current state and third parameter is the edev pointer.
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> Have you checked how it looks like in resulting document file (man /
>>> html / ...) ?
>>> My concern is multi-line short function description.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, I didn't consider the document file as you mentioned.
>> Do you think need to add more detailed description?
>
> What I meant is the quite long line in *short* description (fist line
> heading with function name).
> See Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst for the detailed howto.
>
If you metioned the following guide on Line 111
in the Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst,
OK. I'll modify it.
Example kernel-doc function comment::
/**
* foobar() - Brief description of foobar.
* @arg: Description of argument of foobar.
*
* Longer description of foobar.
*
* Return: Description of return value of foobar.
*/
int foobar(int arg)
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists