[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490880922.4702.66.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:35:22 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:02 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 14:51 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Also, why does it raise power consumption issues?
>
> On a system without either nohz_full or nohz idle
> mode, skewed ticks result in CPU cores waking up
> at different times, and keeping an idle system
> consuming power for more time than it would if all
> the ticks happened simultaneously.
And if your server farm is mostly idle, that power savings may delay
your bankruptcy proceedings by a whole microsecond ;-)
Or more seriously, what skew does do on boxen of size X today is
something for perf to say. At the time, removal was very bad for my 8
socket box, and allegedly caused huge SGI beasts in horrific pain.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists