linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:38:23 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately
 if clk is NULL

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
> ---

Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else
was going to apply it. Thanks!

     Arnd