[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a34huU3UNYX8i+3cVMMpz=31yR+2WzmtyOYBP4rPpmwZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:38:23 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately
if clk is NULL
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
> ---
Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else
was going to apply it. Thanks!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists