[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97434C93-32EF-4742-838D-4C783E5ECC45@schinagl.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:39:39 +0200
From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "dev@...ux-sunxi.org" <dev@...ux-sunxi.org>,
Ed Blake <ed.blake@...tec.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>,
Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jason Uy <jason.uy@...adcom.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield
Hey Vignesh,
On March 30, 2017 9:57:19 AM CEST, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com> wrote:
>
>
>On Thursday 30 March 2017 12:13 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>
>>
>> On March 30, 2017 8:15:29 AM CEST, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 30 March 2017 12:14 AM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h
>>> b/include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h
>>>> index 5db76880b4ad..489522389a10 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h
>>>> @@ -31,18 +31,18 @@
>>>> #define UART_IERX_SLEEP 0x10 /* Enable sleep mode */
>>>>
>>>> #define UART_IIR 2 /* In: Interrupt ID Register */
>>>> -#define UART_IIR_NO_INT 0x01 /* No interrupts pending */
>>>> -#define UART_IIR_ID 0x0e /* Mask for the interrupt ID */
>>>> #define UART_IIR_MSI 0x00 /* Modem status interrupt */
>>>> +#define UART_IIR_NO_INT 0x01 /* No interrupts pending */
>>>> #define UART_IIR_THRI 0x02 /* Transmitter holding register empty
>*/
>>>> #define UART_IIR_RDI 0x04 /* Receiver data interrupt */
>>>> #define UART_IIR_RLSI 0x06 /* Receiver line status interrupt */
>>>> -
>>>> #define UART_IIR_BUSY 0x07 /* DesignWare APB Busy Detect */
>>>> +#define UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT 0x0c /* DesignWare RX Timeout
>interrupt
>>> */
>> It was moved due to sorting. The comment could be changed maybe? I
>renamed it from omap to dw as i believe the omap also uses the dw ip.
>But i think it is a defacto standard mapping of the irr register?
>
>AFAIK, OMAP UART does not use DW core, please make these IDs generic to
>avoid confusion.
The ids are genetic, the comments are not. Ill update the comments to be generic, with the exception of the omap specific extended ones?
Olliver
>
>>
>>>> +#define UART_IIR_MASK 0x0f /* DesignWare IIR mask */
>>>>
>>>> -#define UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT 0x0c /* OMAP RX Timeout interrupt */
>>>
>>> You are removing UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT? Is this intended?
>>>
>>>> #define UART_IIR_XOFF 0x10 /* OMAP XOFF/Special Character */
>>>> #define UART_IIR_CTS_RTS_DSR 0x20 /* OMAP CTS/RTS/DSR Change */
>>>> +#define UART_IIR_EXT_MASK 0x30 /* OMAP extended IIR mask */
>>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists