[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170330171701.GA8062@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:20:12 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Subject: Re: sudo x86info -a => kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:78!
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:45:26AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Tommi Rantala
> <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Running:
> >
> > $ sudo x86info -a
> >
> > On this HP ZBook 15 G3 laptop kills the x86info process with segfault and
> > produces the following kernel BUG.
> >
> > $ git describe
> > v4.11-rc4-40-gfe82203
> >
> > It is also reproducible with the fedora kernel: 4.9.14-200.fc25.x86_64
> >
> > Full dmesg output here: https://pastebin.com/raw/Kur2mpZq
> >
> > [ 51.418954] usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from
> > ffff880000090000 (dma-kmalloc-256) (4096 bytes)
>
> This seems like a real exposure: the copy is attempting to read 4096
> bytes from a 256 byte object.
>
> > [...]
> > [ 51.419063] Call Trace:
> > [ 51.419066] read_mem+0x70/0x120
> > [ 51.419069] __vfs_read+0x28/0x130
> > [ 51.419072] ? security_file_permission+0x9b/0xb0
> > [ 51.419075] ? rw_verify_area+0x4e/0xb0
> > [ 51.419077] vfs_read+0x96/0x130
> > [ 51.419079] SyS_read+0x46/0xb0
> > [ 51.419082] ? SyS_lseek+0x87/0xb0
> > [ 51.419085] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa9
>
> I can't reproduce this myself, so I assume it's some specific /proc or
> /sys file that I don't have. Are you able to get a strace of x86info
> as it runs to see which file it is attempting to read here?
Presumably this is /dev/mem, with read_mem in drivers/char/mem.c.
I guess you may have locked that down on your system anyhow. ;)
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists