linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] fujitsu-laptop: use sparse keymaps for input event handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:26:26 +1030
From:   Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] fujitsu-laptop: use sparse keymaps for input event
 handling

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:36:50PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 07:35:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > 
> > > Darren, Andy, in light of the above I will be awaiting your review of
> > > this series.  I will submit v2 afterwards, with all remarks from both
> > > you and Jonathan taken into account.
> > 
> > Darren marked this series under his name to review, so, I let him to
> > speak for us.
> 
> The series looks good to me. Nice work Micha??. They are logically divided and
> address issues in a procedural way (so I stopped commenting until I read the
> full series through as a couple of times you addressed a concern from a move in
> a cleanup to follow).
> 
> I've applied the noted change to 7/8 and will run this through my tests, but
> don't anticipate any problems. Jonathan, if you don't have any additional
> concerns, let me know if I can add your Reviewed-by.

With the noted change to 7/8 applied I'm happy with the resulting series. 
As you noted, there is still some scope for making things more consistent,
especially with regard to error handling.  However, that is really a
separate task which can be addressed in a later series.  This present series
doesn't impact on this issue in any significant way so it makes sense that
be applied.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>

Regards
  jonathan