[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5304103e-5a0b-230b-6bd0-1b33ab546889@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:03:36 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: enable big packets for large MTU values
On 2017年03月29日 20:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> If one enables e.g. jumbo frames without mergeable
> buffers, packets won't fit in 1500 byte buffers
> we use. Switch to big packet mode instead.
> TODO: make sizing more exact, possibly extend small
> packet mode to use larger pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index e0fb3707..9dc31dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2428,6 +2428,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> dev->mtu = mtu;
> dev->max_mtu = mtu;
> }
> +
> + /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> + if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> + vi->big_packets = true;
> }
>
> if (vi->any_header_sg)
Ok, I think maybe we should fail the probe of small buffer in this case
and decrease the max_mtu to ETH_DATA_LEN if small buffer is used (since
user are allowed to increase the mtu).
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists