lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703311005030.1780@nanos>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
        hch@....de, mingo@...e.hu, jszhang@...vell.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        joaodias@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:

> vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point
> in vfree_atomic().
> This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic()
> to free ldt entries")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ