linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
        hch@....de, mingo@...e.hu, jszhang@...vell.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        joaodias@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:

> vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point
> in vfree_atomic().
> This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic()
> to free ldt entries")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>