[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703311005030.1780@nanos>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
hch@....de, mingo@...e.hu, jszhang@...vell.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
joaodias@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point
> in vfree_atomic().
> This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic()
> to free ldt entries")
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists