linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] base: soc: soc_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:39:37 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] base: soc: soc_device_match() improvements

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:48:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> >         Hi Arnd, Greg, Kevin, Magnus, Olof, Simon,
> >
> > This patch series contains two improvements for the SoC bus and
> > soc_device_match().  The second one is a dependency for handling
> > different SoC revisions in the Renesas R-Car SYSC driver, which manages
> > PM Domains and thus needs to be initialized from an early_initcall[*].
> >
> > Changes compared to v1:
> >   - Drop RFC state,
> >   - Add more explanation,
> >   - Add Acked-by.
> >
> > Due to the dependency, and as changes for the Renesas R-Car SYSC driver
> > typically go in through the renesas and arm-soc trees, and if you agree,
> > I would like to send a pull request for these changes, to be pulled by
> > all of the driver core, renesas, and arm-soc trees.  This is similar to
> > how soc_device_match() was integrated earlier.
> > Then the Renesas R-Car SYSC driver changes can easily be queued on top
> > in the renesas tree afterwards.
> >
> > Do you agree?
> > Thanks for your answer!
> 
> Merging this through arm-soc is fine with me.

Thanks, in that case I am fine with this plan.

> > P.S. If you think it's already too late in the cycle to queue Renesas
> > R-Car SYSC driver changes for v4.12 on top, please say so.  Then the
> > dependency is relaxed, and this series can just go in through the
> > driver core tree, with the Renesas part to follow for v4.13.
> 
> We can take it for 4.12.

Thanks again. My preference at this time is to deffer the DT changes to v4.13
as it seems somewhat simpler and I'm not aware of any urgency to get them
into v4.12.