linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] remove custom Michael MIC implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:21:13 +1100
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...uxdriverproject.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] remove custom Michael MIC implementation

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:58:51AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > The code is untested, I have hardware in the mail.
> 
> Cool!

The card I have is a Spectec FCC ID: S2Y-WLAN-11B-G which I believe is
a SDW-823 and should use the ks7010 driver. I am going to attempt to
get it running on a Raspberry Pi B+. I ordered the wrong size break
out board originally so waiting on the new one now.

> 
> > If any one is interested and has any comments I would really like to
> > hear them. I am open to all suggestions (even down to trivial coding
> > style issues).
> 
> I'll just repeat that the key move to get this driver out of staging is
> to get away from the WEXT interface to CFG80211. Otherwise no chance
> that wireless maintainers will even look at it. This is a huge change
> but once it is done, features like Michael MIC come with it for free
> (from what I recall, I am not a wireless expert myself).

That would explain why I could not find more than the Orinoco driver
using the Michael MIC module directly.

> Without the CFG80211 conversion, replacing the Michael custom
> implementation with the in-kernel one makes the driver a tad better and
> is good exercise. However, it will sadly not help to get the driver out
> of staging.

I'll drop it then. Could you please tell me, is there any thing else
more I need to do to let LKML know that this RFC is dropped? Or is
this reply enough. I don't want to use any ones time unnecessarily.

> 
> But if you want a clean WEXT driver first, this is a step in the right
> direction.
> 

Let's go for a CFG80211 driver and get out of staging :) So next step
is I guess study the ath6kl driver, learn how CFG80211 is done and
implement that interface in ks7010? Oh, and test that it works.

thanks,
Tobin.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)