linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:24:58 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:32:54 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Mark Brown's build bot now reports this build failure:
> 
>         arm64-defconfig
> ../arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h:62:29: error: implicit declaration of
> function '_BUG_FLAGS' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> I think the last line needs s/_BUG_FLAGS/__BUG_FLAGS/
> aside from that, the merge looks right to me, but I wonder if
> there is a way to prevent the conflict from showing up later
> for Linus.

Yeah, I have fixed that for Monday.  I just presume that Linus will not
be half blind when he fixes it up. :-)

Or someone could remember to mention it to him. ;-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell