linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: Add documentation for GP10B GPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170331125607.GA29779@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:56:07 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: Add documentation for GP10B GPU

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:26:44PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> GP10B's definition is mostly similar to GK20A's and GM20B's. The only
> noticeable difference is the use of power domains instead of a regulator
> for power supply.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - It's much better when it compiles.
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
> index ff3db65e50de..b7e4c7444510 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties:
>    Currently recognized values:
>    - nvidia,gk20a
>    - nvidia,gm20b
> +  - nvidia,gp10b
>  - reg: Physical base address and length of the controller's registers.
>    Must contain two entries:
>    - first entry for bar0
> @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ Required properties:
>  - interrupt-names: Must include the following entries:
>    - stall
>    - nonstall
> -- vdd-supply: regulator for supply voltage.
> +- vdd-supply: regulator for supply voltage. Only required for GPUs not using
> +  power domains.
>  - clocks: Must contain an entry for each entry in clock-names.
>    See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details.
>  - clock-names: Must include the following entries:
> @@ -27,6 +29,8 @@ is also required:
>    See ../reset/reset.txt for details.
>  - reset-names: Must include the following entries:
>    - gpu
> +- power-domains: GPUs that make use of power domains can define this property
> +  instead of vdd-supply. Currently "nvidia,gp10b" makes use of this.
>  
>  Optional properties:
>  - iommus: A reference to the IOMMU. See ../iommu/iommu.txt for details.
> @@ -68,3 +72,22 @@ Example for GM20B:
>  		iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
> +
> +Example for GP10B:
> +
> +	gpu@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,gp10b";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x17000000 0x0 0x1000000>,
> +		      <0x0 0x18000000 0x0 0x1000000>;

Would it make sense to add a reg-names property to give these meaning? I
know that the binding describes what each entry is, but having the names
specified in a property would make it more immediately obvious.

Just a thought, otherwise looks good to me.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)