[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331133728.GA23725@rajaneesh-OptiPlex-9010>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:07:32 +0530
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: andy@...radead.org, qipeng.zha@...el.com, dvhart@...radead.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, wim@...ana.be, sathyaosid@...il.com,
david.e.box@...ux.intel.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix gcr offset
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:06:18PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> According to the PMC spec, gcr offset from ipc mem
Which spec? We can just use generic terms for BXT/APL PMC.
> region is 0x1000(4K). But currently this driver uses
> 0x1008 as gcr offset. This patch fixes this issue.
>
Patch is good but i feel it's better to have little more explanation in the
commit message since the subject looks very similar to one old patch that
seems to have created the issue being fixed by this one.
Have a look at:
intel_pmc_ipc: Fix GCR register base address and length
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> index 0651d47..0a33592 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
> /* exported resources from IFWI */
> #define PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_INDEX 0
> #define PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_SIZE 0x1000
> -#define PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET 0x1008
> +#define PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET 0x1000
> #define PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_SIZE 0x1000
> #define PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_DATA_INDEX 1
> #define PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_IFACE_INDEX 2
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Best Regards,
Rajneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists