| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <58DDCDEA.5090803@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:32:58 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/iova: insert start_pfn boundary of dma32
Because the problem of my email-server, all patches sent to Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> failed.
So I repost this email again.
On 2017/3/24 11:43, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/3/23 21:01, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 22/03/17 06:27, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> Reserve the first granule size memory(start at start_pfn) as boundary
>>> iova, to make sure that iovad->cached32_node can not be NULL in future.
>>> Meanwhile, changed the assignment of iovad->cached32_node from rb_next to
>>> rb_prev of &free->node in function __cached_rbnode_delete_update.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow this. It's a top-down allocator, so cached32_node
>> points to the last node allocated (or the node above the last one freed)
>> on the assumption that there is likely free space directly below there,
>> thus it's a pretty good place for the next allocation to start searching
>> from. On the other hand, start_pfn is a hard "do not go below this line"
>> limit, so it doesn't seem to make any sense to ever point the former at
>> the latter.
> This patch just prepares for dma64. Because we really need to add the boundary
> between dma32 and dma64, there are two main purposes:
> 1. to make dma32 iova allocation faster, because the last node which dma32 can be
> seen is the boundary. So dma32 iova allocation will only try within dma32 iova space.
> Meanwhile, we hope dma64 allocation try dma64 iova space(iova>=4G) first, because the
> maxium dma32 iova space is 4GB, dma64 iova space is almost richer than dma32.
>
> 2. to prevent a allocated iova cross dma32 and dma64 space. Otherwise, this special
> case should be considered when allocate and free iova.
>
> After the above boundary added, it's better to add start_pfn of dma32 boundary also,
> to make them to be considered in one model.
>
> After the two boundaries added, adjust cached32/64_node point to the free iova node can
> simplified programming.
>
>
>>
>> I could understand slightly more if we were reserving the PFN *above*
>> the cached range, but as-is I don't see what we gain from the change
>> here, nor what benefit the cached32_node != NULL assumption gives
>> (AFAICS it would be more useful to simply restrict the cases where it
>> may be NULL to when the address space is either completely full or
>> completely empty, or perhaps both).
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> index 1c49969..b5a148e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,17 @@ static unsigned long iova_rcache_get(struct iova_domain *iovad,
>>> static void init_iova_rcaches(struct iova_domain *iovad);
>>> static void free_iova_rcaches(struct iova_domain *iovad);
>>>
>>> +static void
>>> +insert_iova_boundary(struct iova_domain *iovad)
>>> +{
>>> + struct iova *iova;
>>> + unsigned long start_pfn_32bit = iovad->start_pfn;
>>> +
>>> + iova = reserve_iova(iovad, start_pfn_32bit, start_pfn_32bit);
>>> + BUG_ON(!iova);
>>> + iovad->cached32_node = &iova->node;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void
>>> init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule,
>>> unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long pfn_32bit)
>>> @@ -45,27 +56,38 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule,
>>>
>>> spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock);
>>> iovad->rbroot = RB_ROOT;
>>> - iovad->cached32_node = NULL;
>>> iovad->granule = granule;
>>> iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;
>>> iovad->dma_32bit_pfn = pfn_32bit;
>>> init_iova_rcaches(iovad);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Insert boundary nodes for dma32. So cached32_node can not be NULL in
>>> + * future.
>>> + */
>>> + insert_iova_boundary(iovad);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);
>>>
>>> static struct rb_node *
>>> __get_cached_rbnode(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long *limit_pfn)
>>> {
>>> - if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) ||
>>> - (iovad->cached32_node == NULL))
>>> + struct rb_node *cached_node;
>>> + struct rb_node *next_node;
>>> +
>>> + if (*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
>>> return rb_last(&iovad->rbroot);
>>> - else {
>>> - struct rb_node *prev_node = rb_prev(iovad->cached32_node);
>>> - struct iova *curr_iova =
>>> - rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node);
>>> - *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo - 1;
>>> - return prev_node;
>>> + else
>>> + cached_node = iovad->cached32_node;
>>> +
>>> + next_node = rb_next(cached_node);
>>> + if (next_node) {
>>> + struct iova *next_iova = rb_entry(next_node, struct iova, node);
>>> +
>>> + *limit_pfn = min(*limit_pfn, next_iova->pfn_lo - 1);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + return cached_node;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>>> @@ -83,20 +105,13 @@ __cached_rbnode_delete_update(struct iova_domain *iovad, struct iova *free)
>>> struct iova *cached_iova;
>>> struct rb_node *curr;
>>>
>>> - if (!iovad->cached32_node)
>>> - return;
>>> curr = iovad->cached32_node;
>>> cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node);
>>>
>>> if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) {
>>> - struct rb_node *node = rb_next(&free->node);
>>> - struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node);
>>> -
>>> /* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */
>>> - if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
>>> - iovad->cached32_node = node;
>>> - else
>>> - iovad->cached32_node = NULL;
>>> + if (free->pfn_hi <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
>>> + iovad->cached32_node = rb_prev(&free->node);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -114,7 +129,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
>>> unsigned long size, unsigned long limit_pfn,
>>> struct iova *new, bool size_aligned)
>>> {
>>> - struct rb_node *prev, *curr = NULL;
>>> + struct rb_node *prev, *curr;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> unsigned long saved_pfn;
>>> unsigned long pad_size = 0;
>>> @@ -144,13 +159,9 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
>>> curr = rb_prev(curr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (!curr) {
>>> - if (size_aligned)
>>> - pad_size = iova_get_pad_size(size, limit_pfn);
>>> - if ((iovad->start_pfn + size + pad_size) > limit_pfn) {
>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> - }
>>> + if (unlikely(!curr)) {
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* pfn_lo will point to size aligned address if size_aligned is set */
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
--
Thanks!
BestRegards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists