lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331135402.GC23725@rajaneesh-OptiPlex-9010>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:24:03 +0530
From:   Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     andy@...radead.org, qipeng.zha@...el.com, dvhart@...radead.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, wim@...ana.be, sathyaosid@...il.com,
        david.e.box@...ux.intel.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: use gcr mem base for
 S0ix counter read

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:06:22PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> To maintain the uniformity in accessing GCR registers, this patch
> modifies the S0ix counter read function to use GCR address base
> instead of ipc address base.
>

looks fine to me.
 
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 10 +++-------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
> index 8402efe..fac89eb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>  
>  /* GCR reg offsets from gcr base*/
>  #define PMC_GCR_PMC_CFG_REG		0x08
> +#define PMC_GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_REG	0x78
> +#define PMC_GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_REG	0x80
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_IPC)
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> index 0c66c11..54d5254 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> @@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
>  #define IPC_WRITE_BUFFER	0x80
>  #define IPC_READ_BUFFER		0x90
>  
> -/* PMC Global Control Registers */
> -#define GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_OFFSET	0x1078
> -#define GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_OFFSET	0x1080
> -
>  /* Residency with clock rate at 19.2MHz to usecs */
>  #define S0IX_RESIDENCY_IN_USECS(d, s)		\
>  ({						\
> @@ -196,7 +192,7 @@ static inline u32 ipc_data_readl(u32 offset)
>  
>  static inline u64 gcr_data_readq(u32 offset)
>  {
> -	return readq(ipcdev.ipc_base + offset);
> +	return readq(ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
>  }
>  
>  int intel_pmc_gcr_read(u32 offset, u32 *data)
> @@ -838,8 +834,8 @@ int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data)
>  	if (!ipcdev.has_gcr_regs)
>  		return -EACCES;
>  
> -	deep = gcr_data_readq(GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_OFFSET);
> -	shlw = gcr_data_readq(GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_OFFSET);
> +	deep = gcr_data_readq(PMC_GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_REG);
> +	shlw = gcr_data_readq(PMC_GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_REG);
>  
>  	*data = S0IX_RESIDENCY_IN_USECS(deep, shlw);
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Rajneesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ