[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331154012.GC24537@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:40:12 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:15:22AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > > static int rdtgroup_cpus_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> > > - struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > > + struct seq_file *s, void *v,
> > > + unsigned long flags)
> > > {
> > > + const char *fmt = flags & RFTYPE_FLAGS_CPUS_LIST ? "%*pbl\n" : "%*pb\n";
> >
> > Change to:
> > + const char *fmt = strcmp(of->kn->priv, "cpus") ? "%*pbl\n" : "%*pb\n";
>
> You couldn't come up with a more horrible hack, right?
>
> Jiri was right with adding the flag to the base files, just the propagation
> through the callbacks sucks. What's wrong with:
>
> struct rftype *rft = of->kn->priv;
> bool list = rtf->flags & RFTYPE_FLAGS_CPUS_LIST;
You are absolutely correct.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists