linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 18/18] net: hns: Some checkpatch.pl script & warning fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F91A8E7FB5@lhreml503-mbx>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:46:53 +0000
From:   Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        "mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 18/18] net: hns: Some checkpatch.pl script &
 warning fixes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 4:45 PM
> To: Salil Mehta; davem@...emloft.net
> Cc: Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 18/18] net: hns: Some checkpatch.pl
> script & warning fixes
> 
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 12:20 +0100, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > This patch fixes some checkpatch.pl script caught errors and
> > warnings during the compilation time.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_enet.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_enet.c
> []
> > @@ -512,7 +512,8 @@ static void hns_nic_reuse_page(struct sk_buff
> *skb, int i,
> >  	int last_offset;
> >  	bool twobufs;
> >
> > -	twobufs = ((PAGE_SIZE < 8192) && hnae_buf_size(ring) ==
> HNS_BUFFER_SIZE_2048);
> > +	twobufs = ((PAGE_SIZE < 8192) && hnae_buf_size(ring)
> > +			== HNS_BUFFER_SIZE_2048);
> 
> This would read nicer without splitting a comparison test
> onto multiple lines
> 
> 	twobufs = PAGE_SIZE < 8192 &&
> 		  hnae_buf_size(ring) == HNS_BUFFER_SIZE_2048;
For sure, thanks for noticing. Will correct this!

Best regards
Salil
>