[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91bc06e3-3173-43a1-32f2-a35d94855d46@posteo.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:51:38 +0200
From: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@...teo.de>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
wens@...e.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: sun7i: Add CAN node and can0_pins_a
pinctrl settings
Hello Maxime,
Am 27.03.2017 um 08:46 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>> @@ -1582,6 +1587,14 @@
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> };
>>
>> + can0: can@...2bc00 {
>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-can";
>
> Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but this would need an A20
> compatible too, to deal with the case where it turns out not to be
> compatible.
>
> you can do something like this:
> compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-can", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-can";
Adding "sun7i-a20-can" to the compatible list results in a checkpatch
warning, that the "driver" is not documented.
WARNING: DT compatible string "allwinner,sun7i-a20-can" appears
un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
#27: FILE: arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi:1586:
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-can",
Is it really OK to add a driver that doesn't exist yet?
Thanks,
Patrick
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (3709 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists