linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [net-next] stmmac: use netif_set_real_num_{rx,tx}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe586eed-d0a6-f544-30f7-2c41aeed0ca0@synopsys.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:58:59 +0100
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:     <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, <treding@...dia.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] stmmac: use netif_set_real_num_{rx,tx}_queues

Às 5:57 PM de 3/31/2017, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:43:38 +0100
> 
>> @David: Could you please create a branch in your git tree for us to work on it
>> until the multiple buffers get stable for everyone? This way the patches could
>> circulate in the mailing-list with a different target, like stmmac-next or similar.
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> Sorry, I'm not going to do that.
> 

Ok. I will send the patches normally through the mailing-list.

Thanks.