[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331190627.nucviejokdklgtk7@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:06:27 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
hch@...radead.org, nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/24] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add documentation for
#syscon-cells property
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:58:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:15:10PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Add documentation for the optional #syscon-cells property to determine
> > the number of cells that should be given in the phandle while
> > referencing the syscon-node.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> I did? When?
>
> I'm not remembering why we need this. Generally, phandles to a syscon
> are for a single defined purpose. When do we need a list of them?
Ah, I remember now the context. I suggested using standard parsing
function rather than open coding. I wasn't suggesting changing the
binding. Instead of of_parse_phandle_with_args, can't
of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args work?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists