linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: make movable onlining suck less

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170331191924.GB3021@osiris>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:19:24 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
        Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, qiuxishi@...wei.com,
        Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>, slaoub@...il.com,
        Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: make movable onlining suck less

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Patch 5 is the core of the change. In order to make it easier to review
> I have tried it to be as minimalistic as possible and the large code
> removal is moved to patch 6.
> 
> I would appreciate if s390 folks could take a look at patch 4 and the
> arch_add_memory because I am not sure I've grokked what they wanted to
> achieve there completely.

[adding Gerald Schaefer]

This seems to work fine on s390. So for the s390 bits:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>